Speech-to-Print vs Traditional Phonics: Two Ways Reading Is Taught
Speech-to-print and traditional phonics are two approaches to structured literacy. This article explains how the approaches differ and why beginning with spoken language helps most struggling readers understand how written language works faster and easier.
Two approaches to structured literacy
When parents begin learning about reading instruction, they often discover that even phonics-based programs can differ in how they teach children.
Two common frameworks are print-to-speech and speech-to-print (aka, linguistic phonics).
Both approaches fall under the umbrella of structured literacy and both teach children about the relationship between sounds and letters.
However, they start from different directions.
Print-to-speech
In print-to-speech instruction, lessons begin with letters on the page.
Children are introduced to a letter and taught the sound or sounds that letter can represent. Over time, they learn additional spelling patterns, syllable rules, and word structures.
Many traditional phonics programs follow this structure.
This approach can work well when instruction is clear, systematic, and when the child does not have additional challenges like ADHD, executive function difficulties, problem-solving weaknesses, etc.
Speech-to-print
Speech-to-print instruction begins in the opposite direction.
Instead of starting with letters, instruction begins with the spoken sounds that children have been learning and organizing since the day they were born.
Children first learn to identify a sound, then explore the different ways that sound can be represented by letters.
This approach builds directly on skills children already have: listening and speaking.
For struggling readers, this can make the connection between speech and print easier to understand.
A practical example
Consider the word “quit” in a print-to-speech lesson
Children usually learn that the letter Q is always followed by the letter U.
Often they learn that the letter combination QU represents the sound unit /kw/. Those two different speech sounds are not seen as separate and distinct.
On the surface, that seems fine.
But, now a struggling child has four rules that they have to manage:
how the letter U works when it represents the short vowel sound “u” as in cup
how the letter U works when it represents the long vowel sound “oo” or “u-e” as in “tube”
how the letter U works when it represents the long vowel sound “you” or “u-e” as in “cube”
how the letter U works when it follows Q.
That’s a lot for one letter and we’ve barely scratched the surface. Think about digraphs and trigraphs like UE, UI, AU, OU, URE, OUGH, GU, QUE. The list is very long.
Now consider the word “quit” in a speech-to-print lesson
Units are organized by speech sound, not letter. Children first learn the common spellings for a sound using words they routinely encounter in everyday life. For example:
/w/ → W as in “win”
/w/ → WH as in “white”
/w/ → U as in “quit” or “penguin”
/w/ → __ as in “__one”
When investigating words like “quit,” they identify the four sounds within the word (/k/, /w/, the short I sound, and /t/) and how they’re spelled:
/k/ → Q
/w/ → U
short I → I
/t/ → T
Simpler. Easier. Done.
As learning progresses, they learn less common spellings and word parts.
Spelling “rules” are limited to those that are actually followed by most words most of the time.
This approach harnesses the organizational system they’ve been working on since birth for easier and faster learning. In addition, it emphasizes cognitive flexibility and pattern recognition in written language for improved carryover.
Why this difference matters
Both frameworks teach children important information about reading.
However, modern research has begun showing that starting with speech sounds may provide a more natural path for children who are already struggling with written language. That natural path has been resulting in improved reading outcomes in school and everyday life.
By connecting spoken language, spelling, reading, and meanings from the beginning, students can build stronger connections between the skills involved in literacy.
Finding the right fit
The most important factor is not the name of the program, but whether the instruction helps a child truly understand how the written code of English works in a manageable way.
When children understand the relationship between sounds, letters, and word structure, they usually become much more confident readers.
And, for struggling children, finding the right fit earlier is key.
Questions Parents Often Ask About Reading Struggles
-
Speech-to-print instruction begins with spoken sounds and teaches how those sounds are represented by letters in written language.
-
Print-to-speech instruction begins with letters and teaches the sounds those letters represent.
-
Starting with speech can help struggling readers connect spoken language to written words more naturally.
Starting with letters requires the child to first create a new organizational system for language.
-
Yes. Both speech-to-print and print-to-speech are structured literacy approaches that teach the relationship between sounds and letters.
They begin instruction from different directions and use different organizational systems.
Further Reading for Parents
Why Bright Kids Sometimes Struggle With Reading — And What Actually Helps
Learn how reading depends on decoding, spelling, and language comprehension, and why intelligent students can still experience reading difficulties.Is It Normal for a 7-Year-Old to Struggle With Reading?
Explains what typical reading development looks like around age seven and how to recognize when a child may benefit from additional reading support.Signs of Dyslexia in Bright Children
Describes common signs of dyslexia that can appear even in bright, capable children and how language-based reading support can help.Six Signs Your Child May Need Reading Help (Even If They’re Bright)
Highlights six common signs that a child may benefit from additional reading support, even when they are intelligent and doing well in other areas.Why Your Child Can’t Sound Out Words When Reading
Explains why some bright children struggle to sound out words when reading and how targeted instruction can strengthen decoding skills.What Is Structured Literacy? A Parent-Friendly Guide on Why It Helps Many Struggling Readers
A parent-friendly explanation of structured literacy and why explicit reading instruction helps struggling readers.
Reading Help and Tutoring for Kids in Haddonfield and South Jersey
For many bright students who struggle with reading, the issue is not motivation or intelligence.
Instead, they may simply need clearer instruction in the code of written language.
With the right reading and spelling support, bright children who struggle with reading learn how sounds, letters, and spelling patterns work together so that they can feel confident in school and in life. Some children also benefit from learning in small, supportive literacy groups.
At Cheerful Chatter in Haddonfield, we help families identify the underlying skills that support reading and provide structured, evidence-based support that helps bright kids and teens become more confident readers.
References
Farrall, M. L., Wright, P. D., & Wright, P. W. D. (2018). Wrightslaw : all about tests and assessments : answers to frequently asked questions. Harbor House Law Press.
jaytickle. (2018, November 30). Research and Results | Learning By Design. https://learningbydesign.com/why-spell-links/research-and-results/
Project, L. (2014, January 15). Lindamood Phoneme Sequencing® (LiPS) ® Program for Reading, Spelling, & Speech. LEADERSproject. https://www.leadersproject.org/2014/01/14/contemporary-approaches-to-intervention-lindamood-phoneme-sequencing-lips-program-for-reading-spelling-speech/
Research on Phono-Graphix - Peer Reviewed Publications. (n.d.). Www.phono-Graphix.com. https://www.phono-graphix.com/research.php
Stevens, E. A., Austin, C., Moore, C., Scammacca, N., Boucher, A. N., & Vaughn, S. (2021). Current state of the evidence: Examining the effects of Orton–Gillingham reading interventions for students with or at risk for word-level reading disabilities. Exceptional Children, 87(4), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402921993406
Wanzek, J., Gatlin, B., Al Otaiba, S., & Kim, Y.-S. G. (2016). The Impact of Transcription Writing Interventions for First-Grade Students. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(5), 484–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1250142
Weiser, B., & Mathes, P. (2011). Using encoding instruction to improve the reading and spelling performances of elementary students at risk for literacy difficulties: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 170–200.
Wolter, J. (2009). EBP briefs A scholarly forum for guiding evidence-based practices in speech-language pathology Teaching Literacy Using a Multiple- Linguistic Word-Study Spelling Approach: A Systematic Review. Retrieved May 29, 2022, from https://www.pearsonassessments.com/content/dam/school/global/clinical/us/assets/ebp-briefs/EBPV3A5.pdf
WWC Intervention Report U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Lindamood Phoneme Sequencing (LiPS) ® Beginning Reading Lindamood Phoneme Sequencing (LiPS) ®. (2008). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED503694.pdf
